Cover Image

Landscape assessment in metropolitan areas – developing a visual indicator-based approach

Mari Sundli Tveit, Asa Ode Sang

Abstract


Many studies have addressed landscape preferences in rural settings, identifying key aspects and elements of the visual landscape important for people’s appreciation. Information about these characteristics of landscapes has then been used as bases for indicator frameworks linking measurable indicators to landscape aesthetic theory. However, there is a need to expand and develop these frameworks to be relevant for assessment of metropolitan landscapes. Nine key concepts, identified by Tveit et al. (2006) and Ode et al (2008), in existing frameworks for visual landscape assessment, stewardship, naturalness, complexity, imageability, visual scale, historicity, coherence, disturbance and ephemera, are revisited in a metropolitan context, identifying landscape elements and indicators relevant for measuring visual landscape character in metropolitan areas. The study reviews existing evidence of people’s landscape preferences relating to urban landscapes and links this knowledge to map-based indicators that can be used by planners and decision-makers responsible for the management and monitoring of landscapes. This paper presents the key concepts in development of a theoretical framework for visual landscape assessment in metropolitan areas.


Keywords


urban landscapes; landscape preferences; landscape assessment; landscape elements; green structure; perception

Full Text:

PDF

References


Antrop, M. (2004). Landscape change and the urbanization process in Europe. Landscape and Urban Planning, 67(1-4), 9-26.

Appleton, J. (1975). The experience of landscape. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.

Asakawa, S., Yoshida, K., & Yabe, K. (2004). Perceptions of urban stream corridors within the greenway system of Sapporo, Japan. Landscape and Urban Planning, 68(2-3), 167-182.

Barnhart, S. K., et al. (1998). Behaviour and outdoor setting preferences at a psychiatric hospital. Landscape and Urban Planning, 42(2–4), 147-156.

Bell, S. (1999). Landscape: pattern, perception and process. London, United Kingdom: E & FN Spon.

Bjerke, T., Ostdahl, T., Thrane, C., & Strumse, E. (2006). Vegetation density of urban parks and perceived appropriateness for recreation. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 5(1), 35-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2006.01.006

Bolund, P., & Hunhammar, S. (1999). Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecological Economics, 29(2), 293-301.

Botequilha Leitao, A., & Ahern, J. (2002). Applying landscape ecological concepts and metrics in sustainable landscape planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 59(2), 65-93.

Botequilha Leitão, A., Miller, J., Ahern, J., & McGarigal, K. (2006). Measuring landscapes. Washington, DC: Island Press.

Bulut, Z., & Yilmaz, H. (2008). Determination of landscape beauties through visual quality assessment method: a case study for Kemaliye (Erzincan/Turkey). Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 141(1-3), 121-129. doi: 10.1007/s10661-007-9882-0

Caspersen, O. H., & Olafsson, A. S. (2010). Recreational mapping and planning for enlargement of the green structure in greater Copenhagen. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 9(2), 101-112. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2009.06.007

Cengiz, C., Cengiz, B., & Bekci, B. (2012). Environmental quality analysis for sustainable urban public green spaces management in Bartm, Turkey. Journal of Food Agriculture & Environment, 10(3-4), 938-946.

Coeterier, J. F. (2002). Lay people's evaluation of historic sites. Landscape and Urban Planning, 59(2), 111-123.

Cohen, D., McKenzie, T. L., & Sehgal, A. (2007). Contribution of Public Parks to Physical Activity. American Journal of Public Health, 97(3), 509-514.

Council of Europe. (2003). Presentation of the European Landscape Convention. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.

Dallimer, M., Irvine, K. N., Skinner, A. M. J., Davies, Z. G., Rouquette, J. R., Maltby, L. L., et al. (2012). Biodiversity and the Feel-Good Factor: Understanding Associations between Self-Reported Human Well-being and Species Richness. Bioscience, 62(1), 47-55. doi: 10.1525/bio.2012.62.1.9

Déjeant-Pons, M. (2006). The European Landscape Convention. Landscape Research, 31(4), 363-384. doi: 10.1080/01426390601004343

Ding, D., Sallis, J. F., Kerr, J., Lee, S., & Rosenberg, D. E. (2011). Neighborhood Environment and Physical Activity Among Youth: A Review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(4), 442-455. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.06.036

Ellaway, A., Macintyre, S., & Bonnefoy, X. (2005). Graffiti, greenery, and obesity in adults:secondary analysis of European cross sectional survey. British Medical Journal, 331, 611-612.

Ellis, C. D., Lee, S.-W., & Kweon, B.-S. (2006). Retail land use, neighborhood satisfaction and the urban forest: an investigation into the moderating and mediating effects of trees and shrubs. Landscape and Urban Planning, 74(1), 70-78. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.10.004

Eroglu, E., Muderrisoglu, H., & Kesim, G. A. (2012). The effect of seasonal change of plants compositions on visual perception. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management, 20(3), 196-205. doi: 10.3846/16486897.2011.646007

Floyd, M. F., Spengler, J. O., Maddock, J. E., Gobster, P. H., & Suau, L. J. (2008). Park-Based Physical Activity in Diverse Communities of Two U.S. Cities: An Observational Study. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 34(4), 299-305. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.01.009

Foltete, J.-C., & Piombini, A. (2010). Deviations in pedestrian itineraries in urban areas: a method to assess the role of environmental factors. Environment and Planning B-Planning & Design, 37(4), 723-739. doi: 10.1068/b35015

Fry, G., Tveit, M. S., Ode, Å., & Velarde, M. D. (2009). The ecology of visual landscapes: Exploring the conceptual common ground of visual and ecological landscape indicators. Ecological Indicators, 9(5), 933-947.

Gardsjord, H., Tveit, M., & Nordh, H. Promoting youth’s physical activity through park design – linking theory and practice in a public health perspective. Landscape Research. doi: 10.1080/01426397.2013.793764

Gobster, P. H. (1995). Aldo Leopold's "Ecological Esthetic": Integrating Esthetic and Biodiversity Values. Journal of Forestry, 93, 6-10.

Gobster, P. H., & Westphal, L. M. (2004). The human dimensions of urban greenways: planning for recreation and related experiences. Landscape and Urban Planning, 68(2-3), 147-165.

Grahn, P., & Stigsdotter, U. A. (2003). Landscape planning and stress. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2(1), 1-18.

Green, R. (1999). Meaning and form in community perception of town character. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19(4), 311-329. doi: 10.1006/jevp.1999.0143

Han, M.-H., Joo, M.-K., Kim, J.-T., & Oh, Y.-K. (2011). Seasonal Preferences and Interactions of Visual/Auditory Elements of Streetscape in Namwon City, Korea. Indoor and Built Environment, 20(1), 162-170. doi: 10.1177/1420326x10394481

Hands, D. E., & Brown, R. D. (2002). Enhancing visual preference of ecological rehabilitation sites. Landscape and Urban Planning, 58, 57-70.

Hansmann, R., Hug, S.-M., & Seeland, K. (2007). Restoration and stress relief through physical activities in forests and parks. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 6(4), 213-225.

Helfand, G. E., Sik Park, J., Nassauer, J. I., & Kosek, S. (2006). The economics of native plants in residential landscape designs. Landscape and Urban Planning, 78(3), 229-240. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.08.001

Herzog, T. R., & Chernick, K. K. (2000). Tranquility and danger in urban and natural settings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20(1), 29-39. doi: 10.1006/jevp.1999.0151

Herzog, T. R., & Flynn-Smith, J. A. (2001). Preference and perceived danger as a function of the perceived curvature, length, and width of urban alleys. Environment and Behavior, 33(5), 653-666. doi: 10.1177/00139160121973179

Herzog, T. R., & Kutzli, G. E. (2002). Preference and perceived danger in field/forest settings. Environment and Behavior, 34(6), 819-835.

Heyman, E., Gunnarsson, B., Stenseke, M., Henningsson, S., & Tim, G. (2011). Openness as a key-variable for analysis of management trade-offs in urban woodlands. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 10(4), 281-293. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2011.07.003

Heyman, E. (2012). Analysing recreational values and management effects in an urban forest with the visitor-employed photography method. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 11(3), 267-277. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2012.02.003

Hofmann, M., Westermann, J. R., Kowarik, I., & Van der Meer, E. (2012). Perceptions of parks and urban derelict land by landscape planners and residents. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 11(3), 303-312. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2012.04.001

Jim, C.Y. & Chen, W.Y. (2006). Perception and attitude toward urban green spaces in Guangzhou (China). Environmental Management 38, 338-349.

Jorgensen, A., Hitchmough, J., & Calvert, T. (2002). Woodland spaces and edges: their impact on perception of safety and preference. Landscape and Urban Planning, 60(3), 135-150.

Jorgensen, A., & Anthopoulou, A. (2007). Enjoyment and fear in urban woodlands - Does age make a difference? Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 6(4), 267-278.

Kaczynski, A. T., & Henderson, K. A. (2007). Environmental Correlates of Physical Activity: A Review of Evidence about Parks and Recreation. Leisure Sciences: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 29(4), 315 - 354.

Kaplan, S., & Kaplan, R. (1982). Cognition and Environment: Functioning in an Uncertain World. New York, NY: Praeger.

Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature; a psychological perspective. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

Kaplan, R., Austin, M. E., & Kaplan, S. (2004). Open Space Communities: Resident Perceptions, Nature Benefits, and Problems with Terminology. Journal of the American Planning Association, 70(3), 300-312. doi: 10.1080/01944360408976380

Kennedy, C.B., Zube, E.H. (1991). Attitudes towards vegetation in a desert urban forest: creating sense of place. Journal of Arboriculture 17, 159-166.

Kil, N., Stein, T. V., Holland, S. M., & Anderson, D. H. (2012). Understanding place meanings in planning and managing the wildland-urban interface: The case of Florida trail hikers. Landscape and Urban Planning, 107(4), 370-379. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.07.004

Kira, K. (2006). "The only place to go and be in the city": women talk about exercise, being outdoors, and the meanings of a large urban park. Health & Place, 12(4), 631-643.

Lee, B. J., Jang, T. Y., Wang, W., & Namgung, M. (2009). Design Criteria for an Urban Sidewalk Landscape Considering Emotional Perception. Journal of Urban Planning and Development-Asce, 135(4), 133-140. doi: 10.1061/(asce)up.1943-5444.0000013

Litton, R. B. (1972). Aesthetic Dimensions of the Landscape. In J. V. Krutilla (Ed.), Natural Environments: Studies in theoretical and applied analysis (pp. 262-291). Baltimore, Maryland: John Hopkins University Press.

Maas, J., & Verheij, R. A. (2007). Are health benefits of physical activity in natural environments used in primary care by general practitioners in The Netherlands? Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 6(4), 227-233.

Marcotullio, P. J., & Boyle, G. (2003). Defining an Ecosystem Approach to Urban Management and Policy Development UNU/IAS Report. Tokyo, Japan: United Nations University.

Nassauer, J. I. (1995). Messy ecosystems, orderly frames. Landscape Journal, 14, 161-170.

Nikunen, H., & Korpela, K. M. (2012). The effects of scene contents and focus of light on perceived restorativeness, fear and preference in nightscapes. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 55(4), 453-468. doi: 10.1080/09640568.2011.608548

Nordh, H., Hartig, T., Hagerhall, C. M., & Fry, G. (2009a). Components of small urban parks that predict the possibility for restoration. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 8(4), 225-235.

Nordh, H., Hartig, T., Hagerhall, C. M., & Fry, G. (2009b). Components of small urban parks that predict the possibility for restoration. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 8(4), 225-235. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2009.06.003

Nordh, H., Alalouch, C., & Hartig, T. (2011). Assessing restorative components of small urban parks using conjoint methodology. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 10(2), 95-103. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2010.12.003

Ode, Å., Tveit, M., & Fry, G. (2008). Capturing Landscape Visual Character Using Indicators: Touching Base with Landscape Aesthetic Theory. Landscape Research, 33(1), 89-118.

Ode, Å., Hagerhall, C. M., & Sang, N. (2010). Analysing Visual Landscape Complexity: Theory and Application. Landscape Research, 35(1), 111-131.

Özgüner, H., & Kendle, A. D. (2006). Public attitudes towards naturalistic versus designed landscapes in the city of Sheffield (UK). Landscape and Urban Planning, 00074(00002), 139-158.

Palmer, J. F. (1997). Stability of landscape perceptions in the face of landscape change. Landscape and Urban Planning, 37(1-2), 109.

Peckham, S. C., Duinker, P. N., & Ordóñez, C. (2013). Urban forest values in Canada: Views of citizens in Calgary and Halifax. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 12(2), 154-162. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2013.01.001

Pretty, J., Peacock, J., Sellens, M., & Griffin, M. (2005). The mental and physical health outcomes of green exercise. International Journal of Environmental Health Research, 15(5), 319-337. doi: 10.1080/09603120500155963

Purcell, A. T., & Lamb, R. J. (1998). Preference and naturalness: An ecological approach. Landscape and Urban Planning, 42, 57-66.

Qureshi, S., Breuste, J. H., & Lindley, S. J. (2010). Green Space Functionality Along an Urban Gradient in Karachi, Pakistan: A Socio-Ecological Study. Human Ecology, 38(2), 283-294. doi: 10.1007/s10745-010-9303-9

Roovers, P., Hermy, M., & Gulinck, H. (2002). Visitor profile, perceptions and expectations in forests from a gradient of increasing urbanisation in central Belgium. Landscape and Urban Planning, 59(3), 129-145.

Schaumann, S., & Salisbury, S. (1998). Restoring nature in the city: Puget Sound experiences. Landscape Urban Planning, 42, 287-295.

Schroeder, H. W., & Green, T. L. (1985). Public preference for tree density in municipal parks. Journal of Arboriculture, 11(9), 272-277.

Schroeder, H. W. (1990). Perceptions and preferences of urban forest users. Journal of Arboriculture, 16(3), 58-61.

Ståhle, A. (2007). Sociotope mapping. Exploring public open space and its multiple use values in urban and landscape planning practice. Nordic Journal of Architectural Research, 19(4), 59-71.

Stigsdotter, U. K., & Grahn, P. Stressed individuals and preferences for activities and environmental characteristics in green spaces. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 10(4), 295-304.

Sullivan, W. C. (1994). Perceptions of the rural-urban fringe - citizen preferences for natural and developed settings. Landscape and Urban Planning, 29(2-3), 85-101. doi: 10.1016/0169-2046(94)90020-5

Sullivan, W. C., & Lovell, S. T. (2006). Improving the visual quality of commercial development at the rural-urban fringe. Landscape and Urban Planning, 77(1-2), 152-166. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.01.008

Todorova, A., Asakawa, S., & Aikoh, T. (2004). Preferences for and attitudes towards street flowers and trees in Sapporo, Japan. Landscape and Urban Planning, 69(4), 403-416. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.11.001

Tress, G., Tress, B., Harms, B., Smeets, P. , & Van der Valk, A. (Eds.) (2004). Planning Metropolitan Landscapes - Concepts, Demands, Approaches. Wageningen, Netherlands: Alterra.

Tveit, M., Ode, Å., & Fry, G. (2006). Key concepts in a framework for analysing visual landscape character. Landscape Research, 31(3), 229-256.

Ulrich, R. S. (1983). Aesthetic and Affective Response to the Natural Environment. In I. Altman & J. F. Wohlwill (Eds.), Behavior and the Natural Environment (pp. 85-125). New York, NY: Plenum Press.

Ulrich, R. S. (1986). Human responses to vegetation and landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 13, 29-44.

Ulrich, R. S. (1993). Biophilia, biophobia, and natural landscapes. In S. R. Kellert & E. O. Wilson (Eds.), The Biophilia Hypothesis (pp. pp 73 - 137). Washington, D.C.: Island Press/Shearwater Books.

Van de Voorde, T., Jacquet, W., & Canters, F. (2011). Mapping form and function in urban areas: An approach based on urban metrics and continuous impervious surface data. Landscape and Urban Planning, 102(3), 143-155. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.03.017

Van den Berg, A. E., & Van Winsum-Westra, M. (2010). Manicured, romantic, or wild? The relation between need for structure and preferences for garden styles. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 9(3), 179-186.

Van den Brink, A., Van der Valk, A., & Van Dijk, T. (2007). Planning and the Challenges of the Metropolitan Landscape: Innovation in the Netherlands. International Planning Studies, 11, 147-165.

Van Herzele, A., & Wiedemann, T. (2003). A monitoring tool for the provision of accessible and attractive urban green spaces. Landscape and Urban Planning, 63(2), 109-126.

Voelker, S., & Kistemann, T. (2013). "I'm always entirely happy when I'm here!" Urban blue enhancing human health and well-being in Cologne and Dusseldorf, Germany. Social Science & Medicine, 78, 113-124. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.09.047

Vogt, C. A., & Marans, R. W. (2004). Natural resources and open space in the residential decision process: a study of recent movers to fringe counties in southeast Michigan. Landscape and Urban Planning, 69(2–3), 255-269. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.07.006

White, E. V., & Gatersleben, B. (2011). Greenery on residential buildings: Does it affect preferences and perceptions of beauty? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31(1), 89-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.11.002

Zhang, H., & Lin, S.-H. (2011). Affective appraisal of residents and visual elements in the neighborhood: A case study in an established suburban community. Landscape and Urban Planning, 101(1), 11-21. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.12.010

Zhang, H., Chen, B., Sun, Z., & Bao, Z. (2013). Landscape perception and recreation needs in urban green space in Fuyang, Hangzhou, China. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 12(1), 44-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2012.11.001

Zheng, B., Zhang, Y., & Chen, J. (2011). Preference to home landscape: wildness or neatness? Landscape and Urban Planning, 99(1), 1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.08.006




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7480/spool.2013.1.641



Copyright (c) 2015 SPOOL